Mix of surgical robotics images showcasing feasibility and how research has made them a reality

Surgical Robotics: Who Will Win the Race to 2030?

The surgical robotics market is expanding rapidly, but growth alone will not determine future leaders. 

Companies face critical strategic questions:

  • How can ROI be demonstrated beyond clinical outcomes?
  • How can competitive advantage be maintained when purchasers demand flexibility and robust evidence?
  • Will AI-driven autonomy represent the next major advance or prove to be more hype than substance?

At IDR Medical, we have spent years researching these dynamics with hospitals, surgeons, and procurement stakeholders globally. Below, we outline the trends shaping the market and the factors most likely to separate future winners from the rest.


1. Market Growth – and the Utilization Challenge

  • Forecast: USD 12–14 billion today → USD 45–54 billion by 2034 (15–17% CAGR).
  • Problem: Utilization remains low. Many robots are used for only a fraction of eligible procedures.
  • Procurement view: European Value Analysis Committees cite utilization rate, not clinical efficacy as the primary ROI hurdle.

👉 Implication: Vendors that drive multi-procedure usage and workflow integration (not just new installs) will gain a competitive edge.

Example: Stryker’s phased rollout of the Mako Total Knee 2.0, launched at AAOS 2023, shows how adoption depends on more than hardware installs. With over 3,000 cases reported shortly after its limited release in 2022, and systems now installed across 35 countries, Stryker highlights how surgeon-friendly workflows, robust training, and phased adoption strategies are central to boosting utilization.


2. Competitive Shifts – Ecosystems vs. Point Solutions 

  • Intuitive Surgical → Maintains leadership through training ecosystem but faces demand for flexible pricing.
  • Medtronic (Hugo) & CMR Surgical (Versius) → Compete with affordability and modularity.
  • CMR Surgical → Secured major funding to accelerate U.S. rollout and product innovation.
  • Zimmer Biomet → USD 177 million Monogram acquisition signals ambition in autonomous orthopaedics - potential disruptor vs. Stryker’s Mako.
  • Globus & Medtronic (Spine) → Compete on time-savings and clinical safety.

🧩 Key Trend: Hospitals are shifting from point solutions to ecosystem partnerships (hardware + training + workflow + service).

Example: Stryker’s Mako Total Knee 2.0 demonstrates how ecosystems win. Informed by over 500,000 prior Mako procedures, the new system offers:

  • A digital tensioner for intraoperative ligament stability assessment,
  • 3D CT-based preoperative planning,
  • AccuStop™ haptic technology,
  • Customizable workflows,
  • And robust data analytics.

This shows how vendors must deliver a complete ecosystem that deepens surgeon trust, enhances workflows, and ensures adoption.


 3. Policy Pressures Will Reshape Procurement 

  • UK NHS: 90% of keyhole surgeries robot-assisted by 2035, precedent for other markets.
  • Europe: HTA bodies now assess total pathway economics (OR time, staffing, disposables), not just capital cost.
  • Implication: Manufacturers must develop HTA-ready value dossiers early or risk delayed adoption.

 4. Autonomy & AI – Differentiator or Distraction? 

  • Today’s reality: High-profile AI robotics attract headlines, but surgeon trust is limited.
  • Near-term focus: Assisted workflows (planning, navigation), not replacing human expertise.
  • Biggest opportunity: Data ecosystems linking imaging → intraoperative execution → outcomes.

⚠️ Key Point: Hospitals buy robotics for predictable, improved outcomes supported by clear economic rationale - not novelty.

Example: Mako Total Knee 2.0 reflects this reality. Instead of chasing full autonomy, Stryker focuses on assisted features like the digital tensioner, which offers precise ligament laxity feedback (within 1 mm) without additional instrumentation. This illustrates how practical, data-driven enhancements build surgeon trust and economic value while keeping autonomy grounded in clinical needs.


 5. What It Takes to Win – The IDR Playbook 

Success in surgical robotics over the next decade will depend on a combination of clinical, economic, and operational factors:

1. Clinical credibility  Strong, defensible safety and efficacy data is essential to earn surgeon trust and support adoption.
 2. Economic proof  Demonstrating clear ROI through utilization, workflow efficiency, and total cost of ownership is critical for procurement decisions.
 3. Training ecosystems  Scalable training programs help build surgeon proficiency, loyalty, and confidence in the technology.
 4. Flexible commercial models  Options such as leasing, per-procedure pricing, or modular offerings can expand adoption across diverse markets.
 5. AI & Autonomy roadmap  Practical, incremental AI-assisted features that enhance workflows without replacing clinical judgment can differentiate products.

Bottom Line: Companies that combine credible clinical evidence, demonstrable economic value, robust training, flexible business models, and practical AI integration are best positioned to lead in surgical robotics through 2030.


Conclusion

The next five years will define leadership in each surgical robotics vertical. Success will not go to the company with the flashiest technology, but to the one that combines:

  • Clinical evidence that inspires trust,
  • Economic value that demonstrates ROI, and
  • Ecosystem strength that ensures adoption and loyalty.

Stryker’s Mako Total Knee 2.0 illustrates this winning formula, delivering evidence-based improvements, ecosystem-driven adoption, and practical AI assistance.

Navigating the complex market requires deep insights and actionable guidance. At IDR Medical, we help manufacturers and investors translate research into strategy, identify opportunities, and make confident decisions.

Contact us
today for a free, no-obligation consultation and start turning market insights into strategic advantage.

Book a FREE consultation

 

Back to Blog

Related Articles

How to Develop a Technology Roadmap for a Medical Device | IDR Medical

Developing a medical device is a complex and intricate process.

5 Stages of Product Lifecycle: How Market Research Can Help

Developing a medical device can be a complex process. There are many important decisions to be...

Usability Testing For Medical Devices: All You Should Know

When you’re launching a new medical device, there are a lot of factors to consider if you’re going...